|
Final Product Rubric |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Idea |
Writer has provocative ideas, causing readers to think, exploring ideas without missing important concepts; interesting and informative. |
Writer fulfills her purpose, providing a full understanding of subject without missing important concepts. |
Writer offers an incomplete understanding of the topic, often missing one or more important ideas. |
Writer’s understanding of topic is unclear or incomplete, missing key ideas. |
|
Organization |
Writer’s organization is natural, clear, or logical; the purpose and organizational approach work well together |
Writer’s structure is clear or logical; purpose well-supported by detail |
Writer’s structure at times fails to focus on purpose; development of ideas is inconsistent |
Writer’s purpose is unclear; little clear or logical development of ideas.
|
|
Voice
|
Writer has a distinct individuality, unique to her personality, sometimes experimenting with style. |
Writer reveals elements of her individual personality. |
Writer makes attempts at variety or individuality, though inconsistently |
Writer’s work is unintentionally artificial, formulaic, or without character |
Diction
|
Word choice is often surprising or provocative, adding a new level of meaning |
Word choice is clear and appropriate to meaning |
Word choice is sometimes vague or unclear, too broad or common to aid meaning |
Word choice often confuses or obscures meaning |
Fluency |
Sentences are built for clarity, purpose, and reader interest |
Sentences are clear and readable, do not distract from purpose or reader interest |
Sentences are not varied or crafted to provoke interest; often unclear in meaning |
Sentences are often not clear and confuse purpose or meaning |
Conventions (spelling, punctuation, etc.)
|
Conventions support the meaning of the text |
Conventions do not detract from the text’s meaning |
Conventions sometimes detract from the text’s meaning |
Conventions continually interfere with the meaning of the text |
Research
|
Writer employs a wide variety of research toward her purpose, thoughtfully analyzing it and citing it accurately. |
Writer demonstrates ability to research towards a purpose, critically analyze it, and cite it correctly. |
Writer’s research does not support a clear purpose and/or is improperly documented |
Writer’s research is incomplete, unclear, and/or poorly documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process of Writing Rubric |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Pre-Writing
|
Writer demonstrates a variety of productive methods to prepare for drafting |
Writer demonstrates one or more methods to prepare for drafting |
Writer does not demonstrate how her methods connect to the process of writing |
Writer does not use any methods before beginning drafting process |
Revision |
Writer makes effective and thoughtful choices in successive drafts based upon feedback and personal understanding of style and purpose |
Writer makes revisions based upon feedback |
Writer’s revisions are often surface level or editorial rather than substantive or thoughtful |
Writer makes little effort at editorial changes |
|
Reflection |
Writer is aware of her individual writing process, successes, and failures and negotiates meaning between author and reader |
Writer recognizes growth and areas for improvement in her own writing |
Writer acknowledges the process of writing and learning in her reflections |
Writer does not acknowledge how success or failure impacts her later writing |
Collaboration |
Writer works well with both peers and teacher to contribute and receive feedback on drafts in progress |
Writer participates in peer revision, providing feedback on drafts with peers or teachers |
Writer participates in peer revision, though does not apply feedback to her own writing |
Writer does not participate or participates in a limited or non-productive way. |